Scientific and pedagogical basis for monitoring quality of pedagogical education in higher educational institutions, for example, Osh State University

Authors

  • Mahabat Bylykova Osh State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52754/16948610_2026_1_13%20

Keywords:

pedagogical education, quality assurance, monitoring, higher education institution, methodological support

Abstract

Relevance. This article scientifically analyzes the activities of the Department of Educational Quality and Methodological Support of Osh State University and studies the mechanisms for systematically improving the quality of the educational process. The study examines the impact of such complex tools as seminars, trainings, master classes, lesson evaluation, video surveillance, editorial collegial evaluation of educational and methodological materials, student Olympiads, and international experience exchange events. The results show that these measures contribute to improving the methodological competence of teachers, introducing innovative and interactive methods, and ensuring the active participation of students in learning. The role of the educational and methodological council and systematic monitoring, standardization of the quality of education, and optimization of the educational process are also analyzed.

References

Абытов, Б. (2024). ОшГУ на пути трансформации: от юбилея к юбилею. Вестник Ошского государственного университета, (2), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.52754/16948610_2024_2_23

Айбеков, С., Жээнбекова, А. (2021). Билим берүү сапатын камсыздоо системасынын улуттук негиздери. Бишкек: КР Билим берүү министрлиги.

Марзабаева, Б.Т., Маматова, А. (2025). Сотрудничество Кыргызской Республики и Европейского Союза в области образования. Открытый журнал евразийских исследований, 4, cc. 30-38. https://doi.org/10.65469/eijournal.2025

Biggs, J.B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), pp. 347‑364. DOI: 10.1007/BF00138871.

Biggs, J., Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

Ramsden, P. (1991). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Huisman, J. (2023). Methodological Diversity in Higher Education Research. Journal of Higher Education Studies, 13(2), pp. 45‑61.

Harvey, L., Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 9‑34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102

OECD. (2022). Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

UNESCO. Higher Education Quality Framework. (2023). Paris: UNESCO, 2023. 112 p.

ESG (European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area). (2015). Brussels: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

QAA (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education). (2021). UK Quality Code for Higher Education. Gloucester: QAA.

Newby, T. (2025). Online and Digital Learning in Higher Education: Strategies and Practice. London: Routledge.

SGQA (Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance). (2015). London: UK Government Publications.

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Bylykova , M. (2026). Scientific and pedagogical basis for monitoring quality of pedagogical education in higher educational institutions, for example, Osh State University. Bulletin of Osh State University, (1), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.52754/16948610_2026_1_13