THE EFFECT OF THE FEED ADDITIVE "AMILOCIN" ON METABOLIC PROCESSES IN THE BODY OF SHORT-TAILED SHEEP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52754/16948696_2024_3(8)_9Keywords:
feed additive, amilien, digestibility, dose, level, the absorption of mineralsAbstract
The article presents the results of the study and the influence of different levels of PCD (Amylocin) on the metabolic processes in the body of the rolls of the tailed breed. Probiotic feed additive in the composition of the diet of meat and fat production in the amount of 10 g per head per day compared with control analogues significantly increased the digestibility of dry matter of the diet by 2.84%(p<0.05), organic matter-by 2.63% (p<0.05), crude protein - by 2.5% (p<0.05), crude fat – by 3.17% (p<0.05), crude fiber – by 2.92% (p<0.05) and extractive substances – by 2.49% (p<0.05). As for the increased dosages of 15 and 20 g per head per day of feed additive in the diet of the second and third experimental groups, they also have a smaller effect on the digestibility of nutrients compared to the first experimental group. It should also be noted that the degree of nitrogen assimilation from the feed was also high in the first experimental group compared to the control group – by 10.6% (p<0.001), with the second experimental group – by 5.5% (p<0.05) and with the third experimental group – by 10.06% (p<0.01). The reason for the decline of digestibility and use of nutrients of the diet with an excess of feed additives lilacina, obviously, is to reduce the secretion in the digestive tract. Studies have shown that the new probiotic Supplement has a noticeable effect on the absorption of minerals in the body of the rolls . Thus, the optimization of the amount of feed additives in the diets of animals of the first experimental group contributed to an increase in the amount of phosphorus, calcium and sulfur retained in the body compared to control analogues - by 0.53 g or 33.3 % (p<0.001), and the rolls from the second experimental group - by 0.38 g or 21.8% (p<0.001) and compared with the third experimental group that received the maximum amount of "Amylocin" (30 g/head per day) by 0.48 g or 29.2% (p<0.001).
References
Баграмян, А.С. (2015). Выращивание телят мясного направления при использовании кормовых добавок «Моноспорин» и «Бацелл»/ Ставрополь. (1) -26 с.
Габисония, Т. (2017) Резистентность кишечной микрофлоры к аминогликозидам / М. (2) -104 с.
Георгиевский, В.И., Б.Н. Анненков Б.Н., Самохин В.Т (1979). Минеральное питание животных / - М. (3).-470 с.
Клиценко, Г.Т. (1980). Минеральное питание сельскохозяйственных животных/ - Киев, Урожай, (4) -167с.
Кокорев В.А. (1990). Биологическое обоснование потребности супоросных свиноматок в макроэлементах/ – Саранск, (5) – 172 с.
Лапшин, С.А. (1982). Влияние уровня каротина в рационах на обмен веществ и репродукцию овец. // – Саранск. (6) - С.114-127.
Москалёв, Ю.И. (1985). Минеральный обмен. /Ю.И. Москалёв - М.: Медицина. -С. (7) 228-231.
Овсянников, А.И. (1976). Основы опытного дела в животноводстве/А.И. Овсянников – М.: Колос.(8) – 304 с.
Хабибулин, В.В.(2017) / Использование новых технологических приемов и кормовых добавок при выращивании молодняка мясного скота. - Ставрополь, (9) – 129с.
Хаданович И.В. (1968). Кормление и содержание овец / - М., (10).-287с.
Эдгеев, В.У. (2017) / Эффективность использования кормовой добавки «M-feed» в рационах бычков калмыцкой породы / - Саранск.-(11).-23 с.
Аттокуров К.Ш., Абдурасулов А.Х., Арапбай уулу Н., Особенности кормления крупного рогатого скота, Вестник Ошского государственного университета. Сельское хозяйство: агрономия, ветеринария и зоотехния. 2024. № 1. С. 184-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52754/16948696_2024_1(6)_25
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Бадма Аппаев, Анатолий Арилов, Юрий Арылов, Владимир Косилов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.