The Misunderstood Conquest and its First Examples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52754/16947673_2020_28_4Keywords:
Mecca, Medina, Hudaybiyyah, Conquest, Ghazwe, CompanionsAbstract
The source of Islamic conquests, come from the Quran and from the words and actions of the Prophet (pbuh) himself. Therefore, as in every subject, there are also a number of rules and principles in the sources. The basis of all conquests made during the period of the Prophet (pbuh) and the basis for the armed struggles due to these conquests is the aim to defend. Battle of Uhud and Khandaq, especially The battle of Badr also known as Gazwa-i Badr, are deathsurvival defenses that take place entirely around Medina. As it was before migration, Muslims and The Prophet (pbuh) faced the oppression and persecution of the polytheists.
Muslims and especially the Prophet (pbuh) only wanted to settle for the invitation to Islam. As a matter of fact, Muslims did not use brute force to defend themselves during the Mecca era as divine permission had not been given yet. Despite the fact that the permission to defend with arms came after the migration, they were the polytheists who always attacked or made preparations to attack, like the Battle of Badr. Despite this, Muslims, foremost the Prophet (pbuh), favored peace and at least no bloodshed. The best examples of this are the Islamization of Medina and Mecca. Islamizations of Medina without using any armed force; it is the work of being a complete communique and a good example. Under the guidance of a devotee companion like Mus’ab b Umayr it occurred as a result of an education made by the order of the Prophet (pbuh). Mecca, on the other hand, unprecedented efforts in the history of the world to prevent bloodshed was made, even of the enemy. So much so that even the most serious criminals were forgiven. Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, which is accepted as a conquest like the examples above, consists entirely of a peace treaty. Therefore, the conquest philosophy of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is essentially peaceful. It is not intended for an occupation or bloodshed as it is wrongly thought.
References
Kur’an Meâlı (T. Diyanet Vakfı), Komisyon, 1997, Ankara.
Ahmet b. Hanbel, Müsned, Tahkik: Şuayb Arnavut, 2001.
Arcun, Muhammed Sadık, Muhammed Resulullah, Yayın: Daru’şŞamiye, Beyrut, 1995
Arnold. T. W, İntişar-i İslam Tarihi. Çev: M. Halil Halid, İstanbul, 1943.
Barthold, W, M. F. Köprülü, İslâm Medeniyeti Tarihi, Ankara, 1963.
Başa, Abdurrahman Rafet, Suverun min Hayati’s-Sehabe, Beyrut, 1984.
Belâzuri, Futûhu’l-Buldan, Tahkik: Rıdvan Muhammed Rıdvan, Mısır, 1932.
Beyhaki, Ebubekir, Şuabu’l-İman, Tahkik: Abdu’l-Ula Abdu’l-Hamit, Yayın: Mektebetu’r-Ruşd. Bombay, 2003.
Beyhaki, Ebubekir, Delailu’n-Nubuvveti ve Ma’rifetu ehvali Sahibi’şŞeriati, Yayın: Daru’l-Kutubi’l-İlmiyye, Beyrut, 1405.
Boti, Muhammet Sait Ramazan, el-Cihad fi’l-İslâm, Yayın: Daru’l-Fikir, Dımaşk, 1993.
Darımi, Muhammed b. Hibban, es-Siretu’n-Nebeviyye ve Ahbaru’l-Hulefa, Yayın: el-Kütbu’s-Sekafiyye, Beyrut, 1417.
Ebu Bekir Ahmet, el-Beyhaki, es-Sünenu’l-Kubra, Tahkik: Muhammed Abdulkadir Ata, Beyrut. Ebu’l-Fida İsmail, İbn Kesir, Tefsiru’l-Kur’ani’l-Azim, Tahkik: Sami b. Muhammed Selame, 1999.
Ebu Ya’la, Ahmet el-Mevsıli, el-Mu’cam, Tahkik: İrşadu’l-Hak el-Eseri, Yayın: İdaretu’l-Ulumi’l-Eseriyye, Faysalabad, 1407.
Ebu Zar’, Abdurrahman, Tarihu Ebi Zar’a e’d-Dimaşki, Yayın: Mecmau’l-luğati’l-Arabiyye, Dimaşk, Tarihsiz.
Ebu Zeyd, Ömer b. Şebbe, Tarihu’l-Medine li İbn Şebbe, Tahkik: Fehim Muhammed Şeltut, Cidde, 1399.
Ezdi, Fütûhu’ş-Şam, Kahire, 1970
Fayda, Mustafa, “Fetih”, DİA, XII.
Hamdullah, Muhammed, “Hudeybiye Antlaşması”, DİA, XVIII.
Muhammed, İslam peygamberi, Çev:M. Said Mutlu,İstanbul, 1966.
Himyeri, Süleyman, el-İktifa bima tedemmenehu min Meğazi’r-Resul ves-Selaseti’l-Hulefa, Yayın: daru’l-kutubu’l-İlmiyye, Beyrut, 1420.
İbn. Hişam, es-Siretu’n-Nebeviyye, Tarihsiz, basım yeri belirsiz.
İbnu’l-Cevzi, el-Muntazam fi Tarihi’l-Mulûki ve’l-Umem, Beyrut, 1992.
İbnu’l-Esir, el-Kamil fi’t-Tarih, Tercüme: Ahmet Ağırakça, İstanbul, 1986).
İbn Kesir, Ebi’l-Fida el-Hafız, el-Bidaye ve’n-Nihaye, Beyrut, 1994
İbn Seyyidi’n-Nas, Muhammed b. Muhammed, Uyunu’l-Eser fifununi’l-mağazi ve’ş-Şemail ve’s-Siyer, Yayın: Daru’l-Kalem, Beyrut, 1993.
İbrahim Sarıçam, “Hicâbe” DİA, XVII.
İsferayini, Ebu Avane, Mustahrecu Ebu Avane, Yayın: Daru’l-Marife, Beyrut, 1998.
Komisyon, Osmanlı Tarihi (el kitabı), Editör: Tufan Gündüz, Ankara, 2018
Kureşi, Ebu Muhammet Abdullah b. Vehb, el-Camiu fi’l-hadis li İbn Vehb, Yayın: Daru ibn el-Cevzi, Riyad, 1995.
Mustafa Sabri Küçükaşcı, “Sikaye”, DİA, XXXVIII.
Nebi Bozkurt ve Mustafa Sabri Küçükaşcı, “Mekke”, DİA, XXVIII.
Nemri, el-Hafız Yusuf, ed-Durer fi ihtisari’l-mağazi ve’s-Siyer, Tahkik: Şevki Dayf, Kahire,1403
Salih, Abdullvahid, Subulu’s-Selam min Sahih-I Sireti’l-Enam, Yayın: Mektebetu’l-Ğureba, ed-Daru’l-Eseriyye, Basım yeri belirsiz, 1428.
Semavi Eyice, “Barthold”, DİA, V, Suhayb Abdulcebbar, el-Musnedu’l-Mevduî el-Camiu lil-Kutübi’l-Aşere, Yayın tarihi: Basım yeri belirsiz, 2013.
Suheyli, Abdurrahman b. Abdullah, er-Revdu’l-Unf fi şari’s-Sireti’nnebeviyye, Tahkik: Ömer Abdusselam, Yayın: Daru ihyai’t-Turasi’l-Arabi, Beyrut, 2000.
Şemsu’d-Din el-Kurtubi, el-Cami li-ahkami’l-Kur’an, Kahire, 1964.
Taberani, Süleyman, el-Mucamu’l-Kebir, Yayın: Mektebetu İbn Teymiye, Kahire, 1994.
Vakıdi, Muhammed b. Ömer, el-Mağazi, Yayın: Daru’l-A’la, Beyrut, 1989/1904.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Scientific Journal of Faculty of Theology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
