SIGNS OF FRAUDULENT DECEPTION IN THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CRIMINAL LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52754/16948661_2024_1(4)_11Keywords:
law, fraud, responsibility for fraud, qualification of a crime, abuse of trust, crimeAbstract
The article deals with the question of how the fraud can be committed. The authors focus on such methods as deception and abuse of trust, correlate them, identify similarities and differences. As a result of the study, it is established that fraud and abuse are independent types of fraud that can be committed both independently and in combination with each other. It should be noted that fraud and abuse of trust differ significantly from each other in the mechanism of criminal behavior. Thus, when committing fraud by deception, the perpetrator forms a criminal situation with negative environmental characteristics, and sometimes without him himself, which allows him to achieve a criminal result.
References
Бойцов А.И. Преступления против собственности. — СПб., 2002.
Безверхов А. Некоторые вопросы квалификации мошенничества // Уголовное право. — 2008.
Комментарий к Уголовному кодексу Российской Федерации / отв. ред. В. М. Лебедев. 13-е изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: Юрайт, 2017.
Лопашенко Н.А. Преступность, уголовная политика, уголовный закон. Сборник научных трудов под ред. д.ю.н., проф. Н.А. Лопашенко. - Саратов, Саратовский Центр по исследованию проблем организованной преступности и коррупции: Сателлит, 2013.
https://journal.oshsu.kg/index.php/law/article/view/789/502
Кыргыз Республикасынын Кылмыш-жаза кодекси 2021-жылдын 28-октябры № 127
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Osh State University. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.