THE ESSENCE OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEDURES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52754/16948661_2024_2(5)_26Keywords:
evidence, civil process, state, law, judicial proceedings, judicial evidenceAbstract
Relevance. The article describes the process of proof, and its stages, collection of evidence and methods of examining evidence. In society, in legal proceedings, the value of judicial evidence is high, and it is always relevant in jurisprudence. Problems of collecting and interpreting evidence associated with the evidentiary process are of particular importance in legal disputes, since they are means of proof that determine the outcome of the judicial consideration of the dispute. The purpose of the evidence is to establish factual circumstances relevant to the resolution of the civil case. When studying scientific work, the place of judicial evidence and its problems are analyzed using the example of domestic and foreign scientific literature. The methodological basis of the study is relativity, scientific objectivity with a systematic method, historical, social and other principles.
Conclusions of scientific work: Evidence in civil proceedings is the activity of the parties and other persons participating in the case, aimed at establishing facts that are important for resolving the case. These actions consist of the parties and other persons participating in the case presenting their evidence in court, giving explanations to the court, examining evidence on disputed facts, and other actions.
In terms of philosophy, law and jurisprudence, the purpose of forensic science is to arrive at the truth through evidence. The country's scientists are faced with the task of comprehensively developing the concept of truth in order to resolve the main and contradictions of the current civil procedural legislation related to the need for a harmonious combination of judicial activity and adversarial behavior of the parties.
References
Интернет ресурс: https://ky.wikipedia.org.
Сатыбеков С.С. Кыргыз Республикасынын жарандык процесстик укугу. Бишкек 2012. 135-бет
Баулин О.В. Бремя доказывания при разбирательстве гражданских дел: автореф. дисс.,,докт. юрид. наук. - Москва, 2005. - 31 с.
Кыргыз Республикасынын жарандык – процессуалдык кодекси 29.12.1999-ж. №146
Нахова Е.А. Принцип свободной оценки доказательств в системе принципов доказательственного права в гражданском судопроизводстве // Ленинградский юридический журнал. 2015. № 1
Чернова М. Н. Заключение эксперта как доказательство в гражданском и арбитражном процессе: дисс.. канд. юрид. наук. – Москва 2015. - 177 с.
Коваленко А.Г. Институт доказывания в гражданском и арбитражном судопроизводстве. - Москва: Норма, 2002. - 201 с.
Камил к.Г. Показания подозреваемого как источник доказательств в уголовном судопроизводстве Кыргызской Республики: дисс.. канд. юрид. наук. - Бишкек 2021, -23 с.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Osh State University. Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.