IMORTANT PROBLEMS OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION IN SOME CIS AND EU COUNTRIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52754/16948661_2023_2(3)_17Keywords:
convention, arbitration agreement, commercial arbitration, arbitration court, arbitration notice, UNCITRALAbstract
This scientific article examines the place of international commercial arbitration in some countries of the European Union and the Commonwealth of Independent States. The impact of relevant national laws on the activities of arbitration courts and the recognition of decisions of arbitration courts, problems with enforcement. If we emphasize that in some countries the arbitration courts have become traditional courts, this suggests that the legal development of the citizens of this country, the freedom, independence of the courts and the fact that the state creates conditions for citizens. The purpose of the article is to identify problems in the activities of international trade arbitrators in neighboring countries by comparison
References
П. 44 Арбитражного Закона Великобритании 1996 г.
Ст. ст. 32, 34 Модельного Закона ЮНСИТРАЛ.
Сравните. §§ 1056, 1059 ГПК ФРГ; Ст. 27, 34 Шведского Закона «О третейском разбирательстве»; Ст. ст. 1476, 1481, 1482 ГПК Франции; П. 58, 67, 68 Арбитражного Закона Великобритании.
Сравните. ст. ст. 32, 34 Закона РФ «О международном коммерческом арбитраже»; ст. ст. 32, 34 Закона Украины «О международном коммерческом арбитраже»; ст. ст. 41, 43 Закона РБ «О международном арбитражном суде».
Сравните, к примеру, положения ст. ст. 166-181 ГК РФ; § 116 и послед. ГК ФРГ. Аналогичные нормы содержатся и в ГК Республики Беларусь.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Osh State University. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.